Craig Littlepage

By Yoni Cohen on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 02:25:03 AM EST

calls out Billy Packer. Amen.

News ::


Display:
Craig Littlepage | 21 comments (21 topical, 0 hidden) | Post A Comment

No love for Packer from me (none / 0)

I have no idea why he's still on the air.  Does anyone actually like him?

Still, though, Littlepage can't expect CBS to not criticize a bracket with so many obvious mistakes.  And no, working with a deadline is not an excuse.  The committee has done a very good job in previous years under the same time pressures.


by Slic on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 10:41:48 AM EST
[ Reply to This ]

Littlepaige caught in the middle (none / 0)

Packer and Nanz obviously went out the way to critisize the selections, but it was obviously only the 3-4 Valley teams. There were obvious mistakes in the bracket this year so its not like Littlepaige should be exempt from any criticism.

However Nanz and Packer are the ones who made an ass out of themselves with their attack on the Valley and the selection process in general no matter how much it was deserved. Really i want to find out who actually likes Packer. Thats a fan club with 0 members in it. Get rid of him already. His contributions have been ok over the years and we are all thankful for it. But let the bitter old man go. Its about time.


by Anonymous Hero on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 11:53:13 AM EST
[ Reply to This ]

Can't stand the heat Craig? (none / 0)

....than quit bowing down to the mid-major dominated committee. There were a ton of reasons to criticize Littlepage and he's lucky Nantz and Packer didn't have an extra 20 minutes to get to all of them.

Yoni, hook me up with that email my friend :)


by CoLo on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 12:08:51 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

Packer (none / 0)

Well it appears we have one Packer lover.

by Anonymous Hero on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 01:02:52 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

No, We have one guy... (none / 0)

...who thinks the committee did a crap-assed job and deserved the be called out over it. Since Littlepage allowed himself to be pushed around in the meetings, why complain about getting pushed around on TV.

by CoLo on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 02:53:16 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

Packer Lover (none / 0)

Look no one is complaining that Littlepage was wrong. Every tomdick, harry and nancy knows that. The problem is Packer/Nantz chose the wrong script to blabber in front of National TV.

As noted by another poster below, there were several other questions that needed to be asked.

Capish?


by Anonymous Hero on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 03:02:44 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

Your Mother (none / 0)

...More time and they probably would've asked more questions.

Point is, Littlepage had no reason to complain, he knew what pressures came with the job and I'm sure he wasn't complaining about the compensation he received for the work..

So go play your role as the board minion asshole somewhere else.


by CoLo on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 04:50:49 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

Disagree (none / 0)

I have no problem with Nantz and Packer questioning the commitee chair on choices but ask the right questions first. Anyone that goes to journalism school knows ask the important questions first. If they had more time you know Nantz and Packer would have kept going with their one argument. They would not have changed the subject. For Packer to go on his tirade on 5 year trends is a waste of the viewing publics time. Ask why Air Force got in. Ask why Tennessee and Syracuse were seeded where they are. They had plenty of time to ask these questions on top of their MVC vs ACC point. Dont spend your whole EXCLUSIVE interview time on one subject. One more thing. For Jim Nantz to come in and ask questions when he hasnt followed any college basketball all year is horrible. At Least let Seth Davis and Clark Kellog do the questioning.

by RS on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 05:57:21 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

Tons of reasons to criticize (none / 0)

But I thought they picked the wrong angle.  There are plenty of others teams who can be upset-- Cincy and GW, for example, or Pitt, who got a terrible draw for the second time in three years.  And I still have yet to hear a remotely reasonable explanation for Montana, Tennessee, or Syracuse being seeded where they were.  Even if you don't think the MVC deserved four bids, you have to at least concede that various reputable computer rankings show that the MVC played at a high-major level this year; the other mistakes, on the other hand, were completely inexcusable.

by Slic on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 03:05:40 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

My take (none / 0)

  1.  There were plenty of things to criticize about this bracket, such as Air Force and Utah State, Tennessee and GW's seeds, and geographic concerns.

  2.  Instead of talking about this obvious mistakes, Packer and Nantz wasted their exclusive interview time taking cheap shots at the Valley.

  3.  They also conducted the interview incredibly unprofessionally and came across like huge pricks.

Its a special kind of talent that allows you to take the heat off of a clearly flawed selection process, but Nantz and Packer pulled it off.  Congratulations to them, I guess.

by The Balls of Summer on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 12:48:41 PM EST
[ Reply to This ]

Exactly. (none / 0)

It seemed like Packer and Nantz were going off a script written before the bracket was posted, the main storyline being the Missouri Valley.  Only problem was, the main storyline should have been the bizarre seeding.  They did come off as jerks.  I can never stand Billy Packer, and Sunday was certainly no exception.

Littlepage himself came off as the Michael Brown of the tournament bracket: incompetent, unprepared, and inarticulate.  In the past, the committee's representative has at least been able to put forth some sort of a not-totally-lame basis for its decisions.

This year's bracket IS by far the most flawed I can ever recall seeing.  It's a shame that the people paid to give and to get answers about it totally fell down on the job.


by ben r on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 02:58:53 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

This bracket is the second-most flawed... (none / 0)

...the worst bracket I have ever seen was 2003, when about the only thing they did right was leave us out. I'm still looking for 18-11, 10-6 Big East Boston College from that year...and of course, that was the year they fouled up proceedurally, by putting Brigham Young in a Friday-Sunday regional, when the chairperson of the committee, Jim Livengood, is an alumnus of Brigham Young, and he knows as well as anybody that it's against Mormon custom to do much more than get out of bed on a Sunday.

by SetonHallPirate on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 03:16:09 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

Lighten Up - It's a basketball tournament (none / 0)

Yes, there are clearly flaws in the selection process this year (as there every year).

It's unfortunate that some teams that maybe should be in were left out, but does anyone think the teams that were left out had a chance at winning the National Championship.

At the time I was surprised with Nantz's comments to Littlepage at the end of the Selection show.  I thought they were over the top & still do.  Nantz wouldn't do that with the Chairman of the Masters.

We've got 65 teams vying for the National Championship.  I think it's fair to say if you were one of the top 30 teams in the country you made it in. It's not like college football where it's only two.  How you'd like to be the #3 or #4 colege football team in the country?

Enjoy March Madness.  For a college basketball fan, the glass is FULL.


by BC Alum on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 03:40:33 PM EST
[ Reply to This ]

That's to the left of the point.... (none / 0)

Just because they don't have a realistic shot at winning the NCAA tournament doesn't mean they, their fans, or college basketball fans in general shouldn't be upset that they (FSU, Cincinnati, Michigan, Missouri State, Hofstra, etc) didn't make it in.  For a team like Hofstra, making the tournament, especially as an at-large bid, could have huge recruiting advantages - especially given that they would be the only real NYC school to make it.  Making the tournament has recruiting advantages for all the schools, really.

Additionally, it means a lot to the fans of the schools.  Even if they only get a first round game, it's a lot more exciting for the fans than playing multiple rounds in the NIT.  For some teams, making the NCAA tournament IS the goal, not necessarily winning it.

I know that adding one of the controversially missing teams would mean kicking another team out, but that doesn't mean it's not worth discussing.  And as long as they aren't the 34 best teams in the country, I think it is definitely worth discussing.


by HeyDingis on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 04:40:12 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

no, it's THE basketball tournament (none / 0)

I'm sure all of us who are complaining about the bracket still plan to watch the tournament.  It's because this is the most exciting time of the sports year that people want the committee to get it right.  And this year they dropped the ball.

As "HeyDingis" posted above, those deserving teams like Hofstra and Missouri State that were left out have every reason to complain.  For the vast majority of tournament teams, a national championship is a mere dream; getting the experience and exposure is the real prize.  A strong team shouldn't lose out on that just because some clueless committee member happened to watch a Utah State game days before Selection Sunday and was impressed.

The Cincinnatis and Marylands of the world, though, can kiss my butt.  They don't need the exposure, and they are mediocre teams.  Win more games next time.

To my way of thinking, the most significant injustices this year are bad seedings of good teams.  Tennessee backs into a 2 seed, Illinois falls to a 4, Pitt to a 5, GW to an 8.  These types of screw-ups have the greatest effect on the competition, because the aforementioned are among the teams whose play will impact who does ultimately take home the big prize.  All these teams spent the entire season compiling their resumes with an eye toward earning a seed and making a run at the Final Four.  Is it too much to ask for the committee to get it right, or at least not get it this wrong?


by ben r on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 06:04:57 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

Conspiracy Theories (none / 0)

Nance felt obliged to hammer Littlepage about the major conference schools left out because he has gotten to know plenty of fat-cat ADs through events surrounding the Masters. Nance is the hand picked announcer for that event.

Air Force got pushed in due to some "external forces" hoping to generate some distraction for our currently stressed out armed forces.

Who knows?

Why is Packer still there? He continues to put his foot in his mouth and he looks like he's having no fun.


by Anonymous Hero on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 05:57:43 PM EST
[ Reply to This ]

The question that neededto be asked (none / 0)

Under the time constraints it was unlikely that anyone who scored an interview was going to ask this question (a two parter).  Maybe on Monday, though.

(a) What role did the Utah AD and WAC commissioner play in advocating the candidacy of Air Force and Utah State, the two most controversial selections in years, and

(b) Why did you resort to subjective, non-statistical analysis to defend those picks?

What needs to be addressed in the major media are the issues of favoritism and fraud, which will have ramifications on the selection process for years.


by Anonymous Hero on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 07:03:28 PM EST
[ Reply to This ]

Yes (none / 0)

Especially to (b).  Teams can look good for a couple of games but not actually be all that great.  The idea of the selection process is to reward teams for winning games.  Utah State is the worst at-large team I can recall-- 65th in Sagarin's Chess (based on wins and losses only), and no better in any predictive index.  At least Air Force is in the 50s.

For those who say there's nothing wrong with poor seeding, I just can't agree.  Poor seeding is bad for the same reason that poor reffing is bad-- the team that loses ends up feeling angry and frustrated, and the winning team gets no sense of satisfaction.  That's why it's so important that the seeding process be based as much in objective data as possible, and why the committee needs to be clear about what they expect from teams.  Otherwise, it's too easy for teams and fans to feel like they got screwed.


by Slic on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 08:15:42 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]

Packer is the portrait of perfection (none / 0)

I can see why he would criticize. He's never made a mistake. Oh, except for telling us Arizona and Wisconsin would meet in an 8-9 matchup before that bracket was even revealed, then stumbling and trying to backtrack. I'd like to have seen the look on Nantz, Gumbel, etc.'s face when Packer made that gaffe.

by Anonymous Hero on Wed Mar 15, 2006 at 06:12:56 AM EST
[ Reply to This ]

Billy Packer was right- these guys don't belong (none / 0)

From the NY Times

6 a.m.

That is when the Air Force Falcons put on their uniforms -- sometimes dress blues, sometimes fatigues, sometimes flight suits.

Most of their sport is still asleep. Generally, college basketball players are like any other college students, hitting the snooze button and skipping breakfast. At Air Force, players march with their squadron to the mess hall for a buffet of eggs, potatoes and orange juice.

They need a head start. Most players take six classes each semester, including Practical Advanced Aeronautical Engineering. They spend the summer flying planes and jumping out of them. They participate in combat survival training and ponder whether they will be sent to Iraq after graduation. If time permits, they manage to shoot some hoops.

Air Force is playing under its third coach in three years. Most members of the team did not get a scholarship offer from another Division I college. A few did not even start in high school. Yet they are achieving more than any basketball team from a service academy has since David Robinson was throwing down dunks for Navy.

Air Force is seeded 13th in their bracket, the lowest of any at-large entry, prompting inevitable backlash. The Falcons (24-6, 12-4 Mountain West Conference) have been criticized for playing too soft a schedule, for losing in the first round of the conference tournament, for taking a bid away from a more deserving team.

"I think it's funny when people hate on us," Antoine Hood, an Air Force guard, said Wednesday. "We do so much more than your average college basketball player."

Take, for instance, the week that Hood was ordered into a forest with a rabbit, a chicken and nothing else. He had to sustain himself for eight days on only the rabbit and the chicken -- killing them, skinning them, cooking them. "You call your boys at other schools and they tell you about the parties," Hood said. "You don't want to make those calls too often."

Jeff Bzdelik, the Air Force coach, might have the toughest sell in the country. His recruiting pitch has to go something like this: Come to an isolated academy in Colorado Springs that is 10 percent female, does not allow underclassmen to be off campus after 7 p.m. on weekdays and requires a permission slip to wear a T-shirt to a football game. Graduate and begin a mandatory five-year military obligation, leaving little chance to ever play professional basketball.

The few who signed up for the deal will face fourth-seeded Illinois (25-6, 11-5 Big Ten) on Thursday in a first-round game in San Diego. "Most of us know that basketball will only take us so far," forward Jake Burtschi said. "We are setting ourselves up for something more."

Uncommon foresight is required. Air Force routinely loses recruits to Division III programs. They lost one head coach, Joe Scott, two years ago to Princeton. They lost another, Chris Mooney, last year to Richmond. Princeton, with its high academic standards, can seem a difficult place to recruit, but "it's still a lot easier than at Air Force," Scott said in a telephone interview Wednesday.

For this one week, though, Air Force seems to have it all. The Falcons are playing in a city flanked by military bases, on a court they visit every season, just a few miles from where the movie "Top Gun" was filmed. With one victory, they will go from the team that did not belong in the tournament to the team that symbolizes perseverance, patriotism and all that is old-fashioned in college basketball.

Strength of schedule could take on an entirely new meaning.


by Anonymous Hero on Thu Mar 16, 2006 at 05:47:19 AM EST
[ Reply to This ]

yyyzcfdfcv (none / 0)

½ñÌì´Ó¼¤ÇéСµçÓ°¿ªÊ¼ÁÄ
Ê×Ïȸø´ó¼Ò½éÉܺà 2;àÃ÷ÐÇÃÀÅ®¼¤ÇéСµçÓ°
±¾Õ¾´Ó¸÷´ó³ÉÈ˽»ÓÑÍø»ñÈ¡µÄ
ÔÚÏß¼¤ÇéÊÓƵÏÖÔÚÃâ·Ñ¿ª·ÅÖÐ
ͬʱ×ܶà»áÔ±×ÔÅÄ
¶¥¼¶Ð´ÕæÒ²ÈÃÄãÒ»´Îˬ¸ö¹»
ÁÖÐÄÈçÈý¼¶Æ¬ÄãÓп´¹ýÂð
Èç¹ûûÓÐÀ´Ãâ·Ñ³ÉÈ˵çÓ°ÏÂÔØ 4;Û̳Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ°É
»¹ÓкöàµÄÈËÌåÒÕÊõͼƬ¸øÄ㿴Ŷ
ÔËÆøºÃµÄ»°Ä㻹¿É 0;ÔÕÒµ½Ò»Ò¹ÇéµÄ°éÂÂÄØ
ÄãÒ»°ãµ½Ê²Ã´µØ·½ 7;ÂÔسÉÈËСµçÓ°ÄØ
±ð·Ñʱ¼äµ½´¦ÕÒÁË´óÖÚ³ÉÈËÍøÓÐÄãÒ»ÇÐÏëÒªµÄ¶« 6;÷
±¾Õ¾³ÉÈËÂÛ̳ÏÖÔÚ¿ª·Å×¢²áÖÐ
´óÁ¿³ÉÈ˵çÓ°ÏÂÔصØÖ·Ò²Ãâ·ÑÏò»áÔ±¿ª·Å
ÎÒÃÇ´ó¼ÒÒ»ÆðÀ´½¨ 5;îºÃµÄÃâ·Ñ³ÉÈ˵çÓ°ÏÂÔØ 5;øÕ¾
×ö×îÇ¿µÄ³ÉÈËÍøÊÇÎÒÃǵÄÄ¿±ê
¸øÄ㾫²ÊÉ«ÇéСµçÓ°ÏÂÔصØÖ·
»¹ÓгÉÈ˵çÓ°ÏÂÔØ·þÎñÆ÷²»¶ÏÔöÇ¿ÖÐ
²»Òª´í¹ýÿÌìÓµÓÐ 0;óÁ¿ÔÚÏß¼¤ÇéµçÓ°¸üÐÂ
µÄ»ÆÉ«Íø
ÕâÀïÓÐÄãÏëÒªµÄÒ» 9;е±È»»¹ÓÐͬ־¼¤ÇéСÊÓƵŶ
͵ÅÄÊǷdz£¹ýñ«µÄ 2;ÂÇ飬ÏÖÔÚÃâ·ÑÌá¹&# 169;´óÁ¿ÔÚÏß͵ÅĵçÓ°¸øÄã¿´
¾­µäÃÀÅ®×ß¹âͼ¾¡
ÔÚ´óÖÚ³ÉÈËÍøÕ¾
ÏÖÔÚ³ÉΪ±¾Õ¾»áÔ± 3;¢¼´ÓµÓдóÁ¿¼¤ÇéµçÓ°ÏÂÔصØÖ·
»¹ÓдóÁ¿ÐÔ½»µçÓ°¸øÄã
¿´¼¤ÇéµçÓ°ÈÃÄãÓµÓÐÿһ¸ö¼¤ 9;éµÄÒ¹
»¹µÈʲô¿ìÀ´ÓëÎÒ 5;ÇÒ»ÆðÅÄÔÚÏß͵¿úµçÓ°
ÈÃÎÒÃÇÒ»ÆðΪ´ó¼Ò 1;Ä»ÆÉ«ÂÛ̳Ìíש¼ÓÍß
¹²½¨ÎÒÃǵĻÆÉ«ÀÖ 2;°ÔËÆøºÃµÄ»°Ò»±ßÓ&# 235;ÃÀÅ®¿´ÔÚÏß»ÆÉ«µçÓ°Ò»±ß
ÅÄÉãÐÔ½»Ð¡µçÓ°
ΪÎÒÃǵÄÉ«ÇéÍø×ö³öÄÚÈݹ±Ï×
ÄãÍæ¹ýÐÔ¼¤ÇéСÊÓƵÂð
ºÇºÇÆäʵºÜ¶àµÄÃ÷ÐǼ¤ÇéСÊÓƵ¶¼ÊÇ´ÓÕâÀïÀ´µÄÁË
¸ÄÌìÎÒÃÇÒ»ÆðÈ¥¿´Ãâ·Ñ͵ÅĵçÓ°
Ò»µã¶¼²»±ÈÉ«ÇéµçÓ°²îŶ¶ÔÁË
²»ÖªµÀÄãϲ»¶¿´É«ÇéС˵²»
¸øÄã½éÉÜÒ»¸öÇéÉ«ÂÛ̳
ÀïÃæÓкö໹Óдó 3;¿µÄ͵¿úСµçÓ°
Óë³ÉÈËС˵ÍêÈ«¶¼ÊÇÃâ·ÑµÄ
ÕâÊÇÐÇÐÇÃâ·Ñ¼¤ÇéСÊÓƵÂÛ 4;³
ÕâÀïÓдóÁ¿Ãâ·ÑÈý¼¶Æ¬
µ±È»»¹ÓкܶàÆäËû 1;ÄÈý¼¶Æ¬ÏÂÔØÁ¬½Ó
Ïë¿´»ÆɫСµçÓ°¸Ï¿ì×¢²á³ÉΪÎÒÃÇ 1;Ä»áÔ±°É
Ò»ÆðÀ´Ìý͵ÅĵçÓ°ÀïÃæÃÀÅ®½Ð´²µÄÉë 0;÷
¾ø¶Ô±È¿´Ãâ·Ñ¼¤ÇéµçÓ°»¹Òª¹ýñ«
±ðÒÔΪÎÞÂë³ÉÈ˵çÓ°ÊÇ
±¾É«ÇéÍøÕ¾×îNBµÄ¶«Î÷
ÎÒÃÇÖ®ËùÒÔ±ÈÆäËû 1;ļ¤ÇéÍøÕ¾¸ü³öÉ«
ÊÇÒòΪÎÒÃÇÓкܶà 8;äËûµØ·½Ã»ÓеÄÎÞÂ뼤ÇéСÊÓƵÏ 2;Ø
µ±È»Ïã¸ÛÈý¼¶Æ¬ÊÇÎÒÃǵÄÖØÍ·Ï·£¬ 3;âÊÇÎÒÃÇ×öµÃ×îºÃµ&# 196;Ò»¸ö²¿·Ö
°üÀ¨ÎÒÃǵÄ×ß¹âͼƬҲÊÇÆäËûÍøվûÓÐ 5;µÅĵ½µÄ
Ö»ÒªÄã³ÉΪÎÒÃǵÄ 7;áÔ±£¬ÎÒÃÇ»áÔùËÍÄ&# 227;´óÁ¿Ãâ·Ñ»ÆÉ«µçÓ°ÏÂÔصØÖ·
ÓµÓб¾ÕʺÅÄãҲͬ 2;±ÓµÓÐÁ˳ÉÈ˵çÓ°ÏÂÔØÔÚÏß 8;ÀÉ͵ÄȨÏÞ
ûÊÂÒ²¿ÉÒÔµ½ÎÒÃÇ 3;âÀïÍæÍæÍøÓÑÊÓƵ
¾­¹ýͳ¼Æ·¢ÏÖ·²ÊÇ 7;²»¶ÍæÊÓƵµÄÍøÓѶ&# 188;ϲ»¶¿´³ÉÈ˵çÓ°ÒÔ¼°
ÊÕ¼¯´óÁ¿³ÉÈËͼƬ
˵²»¶¨Ä㻹¿ÉÒÔÓö 1;½´ó½³ÉÈ˽»ÓÑÍøµÄ»áԱŶ
ËûÃÇÓÐ×îеÄ͵ÅĵçÓ°ÏÂÔØÏÂÔØ
¿´ÔÚÏßÐÔ½»µçÓ°ÕÒËûÃÇÊǾø¶ÔµÄÊ¡ 8;Ä
²»¹ýСÐÄÌ«¶àµÄÃÀ 7;®×ß¹âͼ
Õ¼ÓÃÄã´óÁ¿¿´ÔÚÏßÉ«ÇéµçÓ°µÄ±¦¹óʱ¼äŶ
ÒªÖªµÀ£¬×î´Ì¼¤µÄ 7;¹ÊÇÃâ·Ñ»ÆÉ«µçÓ°
ÒÔ¼°Ãâ·ÑÉ«ÇéµçÓ°
ÕâÔÚËùÓеĻÆÉ«ÍøÕ¾Öж¼ÊÇÖص㷢չÄÚ 0;Ý
»ÆɫС˵ÓÐ
²»ÉÙ¸ù¾Ý»ÆÉ«µçÓ°Ëù¸Ä±à
ºÜ¶àµÄMMϲ»¶¿´ÇéɫС˵
ÕâÕæÊÇÒ»ÖÖÒÕÊõ¼¤ÇéÏíÊÜ
²»ÒªÔÙ˵¶àµÄ£¬Èà 6;ÒÃÇÒ»ÆðÈ¥¿´É«ÇéͼƬ
È»ºóÒ»ÆðÍæÊÓƵ½»ÓÑ
ÈÃÎÒÃÇÒ»ÆðÀ´½¨Éè 6;ÒÃǵĴóÖÚÉ«ÇéÍø
Ëùν³ÉÈË18
ÄËÊÇ͵ÅÄСµçÓ°ÖÐ×îϲ»¶Ìáµ½µÄ´Ê
ͬʱ´óÁ¿ÐÔ½»µçÓ°ÏÂÔØ
Ò²ÊÇÎÒÃǵÄÃâ·Ñ³ÉÈ˵çÓ°»áÔ±Ëù
ÓµÓеÄÔöÖµ·þÎñ×Ü 4;®¿ìÀ´×¢²á³ÉΪÎÒÃ&# 199;¼¤ÇéСÊÓƵÏÂÔØÍø 3;¾µÄÖÕÉí»áÔ±°É
ÈÃÎÒÃÇ°Ñ×îºÃµÄÃâ·ÑÐÔ½»µçÓ°Ë͸øÄã
Èç¹ûÄãÊÇÅ®Éú£¬±ð 5;üÁËÓëÎÒÒ»Æð¼¤ÇéÊÓƵŶ
Èç¹ûÄãƯÁÁÄÇôÎÒ 1;ÉÒÔË͸øÄãÒ»¸ö³ÉÈ˵çÓ°ÏÂÔØÇøµÄ³¬¼¶ÕʺÅ
ÈÃÄã¿ÉÒÔ¿´±ðÈ˵ÄÃâ·Ñ͵¿úµçÓ°
ÃÀÅ®ÊÓƵÊÇÎÒµÄ×î°®
¿ÉϧÖйúÐÔ°®³ÇÏÖÔÚÒѾ­¹Ø±ÕÁË
²»È»ÀïÃæµÄ´óÖÚ¼¤ÇéСÊÓƵ²ÅÊÇÈÃÈËˬµÄºÃ¶« 6;÷
½ñÌì¾Íдµ½ÕâÀ 6;ÒµÃÈ¥¿´ÔÚÏß³ÉÈ˵çÓ°ÁË
Óпյ½ÎÒÃǵijÉÈ˽»ÓÑÍøվȥ½»¸öÅóÓÑÈçºÎ
Ò»Æð½»Á÷Ò»ÏÂÅÄ͵¿úµçÓ°µÄ¾­Ñé
Ò»Æð½»Á÷Ñ°ÕÒÐÔ³ÉÈ˵çÓ°ÏÂÔصØÖ·µÄ¾­Ñé¼°ÀÖȤ
×ÜÖ®ÕâÀïÊÇÎÒ¼û¹ý 1;Ä×îºÃµÄÉ«ÇéÂÛ̳
ËûÃǵijÉÈ˵çÓ°ÏÂÔز¥·ÅÈÃ
ÎÒÔ¸ÒâÓÃËùÓеĻÆɫͼƬÀ´½øÐн»»»
×òÌì²ÅÕÒµ½µÄ͵¿úµçÓ°ÏÂÔصØÖ·
½ñÌì²»ÄÜÓÃÁË£¬Ëû 5;Ƕ¼ÒѾ­×öÉÏÁ˾µÏ&# 241;¡£×ÜÖ®Õâ¸ö18µçÓ°Íøվ̫ÍêÃÀÁË
ÏëÒªÈκÎÉ«ÇéµçÓ°ÏÂÔصØÖ·
ÄãÀ´ÕâÀﶼ¿ÉÒÔÕÒ 1;½µÄ£¬°üÀ¨×îÐµĺ«¹ú¼¤ÇéСÊÓƵ
²»ËµÁË£¬¸ÕÏÂÔØÁ˳ÉÈËÊÓƵÎÒÏÖÔÚҪȥ¿´ÁË
É«ÇéµçÓ°
»ÆÉ«µçÓ°
³ÉÈ˵çÓ°
¼¤ÇéµçÓ°
Èý¼¶Æ¬
ÒÕÊõ¼¤ÇéÏíÊÜ
»ÆÉ«ÍøÕ¾
É«ÇéÍøÕ¾
³ÉÈËÍøÕ¾
¼¤ÇéÍøÕ¾
ÐÔ½»µçÓ°
ÐÔ½ÌÓýµçÓ°
ÐÔ°®µçÓ°
×ß¹â
дÕæµçÓ°
»ÆɫС˵
É«ÇéС˵
³ÉÈËС˵
³ÉÈËÊÓƵ
¼¤ÇéÊÓƵ
ÃÀÅ®×ÔÅÄ
дÕæ
¼¤ÇéСµçÓ°
ÐÔÉú»îµçÓ°
×ÔÅÄÔÙ¼û£¡
×îºó¸ø´ó¼ÒÍƼöÁ½ 4;öÃâ·ÑµçÓ°ÍøÕ¾Ò»¸öÊÇhttp://www.99tvb.com
»¹ÓÐÒ»¸öÃâ·ÑµçÓ°ÍøÕ¾ÊÇhttp://www.88mov.net

by Anonymous Hero on Tue May 30, 2006 at 04:05:02 AM EST
[ Reply to This ]
Craig Littlepage | 21 comments (21 topical, 0 hidden) | Post A Comment
praise for this site
"I read your blog 2-3 times a day. Keep it coming!"
Gregg Doyel, Columnist
CBS SportsLine, (2004-2005)
praise for this site
"I really enjoy your site.
It's easy to see why people keep coming back. I know I will."
Jay Bilas, Analyst
ESPN, (2004-2005)
praise for this site
"I love the site."
Dan Wetzel, Columnist
Yahoo Sports, (2004-2005)
praise for this site
"I check your blog every day. Grant [Wahl] was right -- it's the best one out there. I rely on it to keep me informed."
Seth Davis, Reporter
Sports Illustrated, (2004-2005)
premium blogads
praise for this site
"The definitive blog for college hoops. A regular stop."
Mark Simon, Researcher
ESPN (College Hoops Extra), (2004-2005)
lead blogads
praise for this site
"If you aren't reading this blog, you aren't following college basketball."
Ed Cone, Columnist
Greensboro News & Record, (2004-2005)
blogads