Three Ins and Outs for the '07 Tourney


Each year there are at least 3 teams that most ardent basketball fans feel should have been included in the at-large field and 3 teams that make us scratch our heads.  Below, I will describe my current six "controversial" teams, include supporting evidence and follow with a poll to gauge everyone's opinion.  Thanks for helping with this debate!

Diaries ::

For me, annually, there is one team that must be in as an at-large and one that I just cannot understand its lofty seeding, etc...This year, those two teams are Appalachian State and Villanova.  The complete six teams in question and their "qualifications" follow.

IN: App State, Drexel and Gonzaga
OUT: Villanova, VCU and Santa Clara

1)App State: Teams are supposed to be evaluated differently when they are without a top player (see Bradley last year).  Donte Minter missed the first 8 games, which included devestating road losses to Clemson, Wake Forest and my beloved Hokies.  They have a questionably low RPI of 56 (but still solid for a Southern Conference team), 8 wins against top 120 teams (4 away/neutral games, 3 top 60 wins), the 4th-ranked non-conference schedule (RPI rating system), 6-3 record in those nonconference games and a road/neutral record of 12-5.  This team can flat out play and a spot in the conference finals should seal a spot.

2)Drexel: These road warriors are a close second to App State in my top three current projected omissions.  Their RPI is very solid at 42, they have 7 wins against top 120 teams (5 on the road, 3 top 60 wins, including at Villanova), a 13-4 road neutral record and 5 losses to top 80 teams.  Granted, they do have 2 bad losses (at William and Mary and at Rider) but this is still a tourney profile.

3)Gonzaga: This is the one team of my three "ins" that I can almost understand not being selected.  However, the RPI (71) is solid considering the schedule (#5 Non-Con with 17 games played) and they have gone 3-2 (one loss to Memphis) since losing Josh Heytvelt.  5-8 versus top 100 teams (all but 2 away or neutral) with 2 bad losses away versus St. Mary's and Loyola Marymount.  Wins against UNC, Texas and Stanford should equate to an at-large bid, especially since all were away from the friendly confines of home.

4)Santa Clara: OK, I am not a fan of the RPI, but I have used it for the "in" teams, so I will do so now for the "out" teams.  Santa Clara's RPI is the only one that I agree with (82), since they only have 4 wins against the top 120 (4-6 versus top 100), with 2 wins at home.  Their non-conference ranking is 68th, with a 9-5 record and they are 8-4 overall in road/neutral games.  The best two wins are at Stanford and Gonzaga (40th and 71st respectively), with two losses to Loyola Marymount and a crushing defeat at home to an overrated Air Force team.  Definitely not an at-large.

5)VCU: I prefer a system where the regular-season conference champion gets the NCAA bid and the tourney winner goes to the NIT, so I must give kudos to the Rams for winning a tough CAA title.  However, they are ranked 59th, with 6 wins against the top 120 (only 4-6 against the top 100) while their best two wins were against ODU and Drexel (home and away, respectively).  The 91st-ranked non-conference SOS offsets a strong 12-4 road/neutral record.  Without the signature win that all 3 of my "in" teams possess, I cannot see why VCU is an at-large team.

6)Villanova: Probably the most controversial team in my "out" section, I just cannot understand the computer numbers or the overall love this team is getting from seemingly everyone.  Their RPI is an amazing 21st with an overall SOS of 7TH!! (I am flummoxed by both numbers).  They do have 10 wins against the top 120 (8-9 against the top 100) but have only 4 signature wins, 3 of them at home, the best being at Georgetown.  The non-conference SOS is 37th, with only three of these wins away from Philly.  Basically, this team has beaten up the weaker teams in the Big East, which is MAYBE the 6th best conference this season.

So, that's my two cents.  If anyone wants to comment to me directly via email, feel free to drop me a line at lakotahokie@hotmail.com.


Poll

Which three teams most deserve an at-large bid?
Appalachian State 100%
Drexel 0%
Gonzaga 0%
Santa Clara 0%
Villanova 0%
VCU 0%

Votes: 4
Results | Other Polls
Display:

sdg (none / 0)

xv4
2dy
d8q
qv8
pfz
gps
s3l
5ug
6mb
o97
tmi
wbz
wxf
bbp
q1x
4zd
w8u
3da
ktc
aig
34j
c9o
8le
ds6
wno
uot
uvx
z0i
bpw
wez

NE TE METS PAS DERRIERE MOI THANKS ;)


by grener33 on Thu Mar 29, 2007 at 10:38:35 AM EST

sdf (none / 0)


by grener33 on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 07:43:59 AM EST

Subject371 (none / 0)

Subject371
Hello...Its GOOD SITE=)

by paraska1 on Sun Jun 24, 2007 at 05:59:00 PM EST

dsvdsv (none / 0)

phentermine
cheap phentermine
buy phentermine
phentermine prescription
phentermine pills
order phentermine
online phentermine
phentermine pill
phentermine 37.5
phentermine cod
phentermine pharmacy
cheapest phentermine
phentermine diet
discount phentermine
phentermine adipex
phentermine tablets
phentermine hcl
generic phentermine
phentermine dosage
phentermine overnight
phentermine drug
phentermine prescriptions
phentermine capsules
phentermine fastin
phentermine overdose
phentermine 90
phentermine medication
phentermine purchase
phentermine side effects
phentermine doctor
phentermine 30mg
phentermine hydrochloride
phentermine obesity
side effects of phentermine
phentermine no prescription
phentermine ionamin
phentermine 37.5 mg
phentermine phendimetrazine
duromine phentermine
phentermine 30
phentermine perscription
phentermine dose
phentermine weight loss
phentermine without prescription
phentermine canada
phentermine phentramine
drugs phentermine
phentermine without a prescription
phentermine rx
phentermine effects
bontril phentermine
phentermine tablet
phentermine fda
compare phentermine
taking phentermine
phentermine interactions
phentermine pregnancy
phentermine fenfluramine
phentermine side effect
phentermine zoloft
phentermine drug interactions
Fioricet
fioricet butalbital
fioricet codeine
fioricet addiction
fioricet dosage
fioricet tablets
fioricet generic
fioricet pregnancy
online fioricet
fioricet withdrawal
buy fioricet
cheap fioricet
fioricet order
fioricet drug
fioricet side effects
prescription fioricet
fioricet with codeine
fioricet no prescription
fioricet on line
buy fioricet online
buy cheap fioricet
fiorinal with codeine
cheapest fioricet
butalbital apap caffeine
drug interactions
tramadol hcl
tramadol hydrochloride
prescription drugs
butalbital apap
fioricet cod
what is fioricet
pain reliever
fioricet 3
pain relief
side effects
fioricet and pregnancy
fioricet tab
fioricet next day
fioricet w codeine
no prescription
fioricet free shipping
fioricet com
side effect
side affects
fiorcet
without prescription
floricet
with codeine
in fioricet
side effects of

by trah1 on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 09:22:15 PM EST
praise for this site
"I read your blog 2-3 times a day. Keep it coming!"
Gregg Doyel, Columnist
CBS SportsLine, (2004-2005)
praise for this site
"I really enjoy your site.
It's easy to see why people keep coming back. I know I will."
Jay Bilas, Analyst
ESPN, (2004-2005)
praise for this site
"I love the site."
Dan Wetzel, Columnist
Yahoo Sports, (2004-2005)
praise for this site
"I check your blog every day. Grant [Wahl] was right -- it's the best one out there. I rely on it to keep me informed."
Seth Davis, Reporter
Sports Illustrated, (2004-2005)
premium blogads
praise for this site
"The definitive blog for college hoops. A regular stop."
Mark Simon, Researcher
ESPN (College Hoops Extra), (2004-2005)
lead blogads
praise for this site
"If you aren't reading this blog, you aren't following college basketball."
Ed Cone, Columnist
Greensboro News & Record, (2004-2005)
blogads